Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell System?
If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. living near cell tower 's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like something that's good however, people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.